Queen Marchesa, Monarchs and keywords!

conspiracy banner

By now, we all know that Kaya killed Brago, and after Brago was dethroned (hah!), the one who usurped him was Marchesa, the Black Rose, who was also present for the original Conspiracy set. Today, her card was revealed, and it is indeed very interesting:

queenmarchesa

So, on face value, she’s a 3/3 Deathtouch, haste creature for four, in the Mardu colours. This is pretty neat for Mardu in EDH, even if she’s terribly overshadowed by other offensive powerhouses like Zurgo Helmsmasher and Kaalia of the Vast. Deathtouch means she’s a lot better on defense, however.

Further, she uses the new keyword “monarch” twice – and while exact rules aren’t quite known yet, it seems to be an emblem-like state in that being “monarch” doesn’t grant you a permanent which can be destroyed, but it can be removed, contrary to emblems. Here’s the token card used for The Monarch:

themonarch

This seems like great  fun in multiplayer, and it’s sure to be useful outside of Conspiracy 2 draft, in EDH specifically. The new Marchesa is a Phyrexian Arena on a stick in colours that are more than capable of keeping creatures off their backs. Mardu has all the best spot removal in the format, and it also comes with neat tricks such as Ghostly Prison and their like.

So far, we’ve only seen a few cards that interact with the monarch state, but I think it has great promise, and Marchesa makes me want to build a Mardu political deck full of neat value cards and utility removal.

Lastly, the fact that we have a true Monarchy of Roses brings joy to my heart:


What do you think of Queen Marchesa and monarchy? Leave a comment!

[SOI] I’m stoked!

soi banner

Lets’ get one thing clear right off the bat: I absolutely adored the original Innistrad block. I have a thing for romantic horror in general, I love Edgar Allan Poe (my candidate thesis was a biography on him) and the flavour of Innistrad was spot-on! As such, I am very excited that we get to return to it soon, and the spoilers are looking pretty darn sweet so far. Madness, a mechanic from Odyssey, a block I adore as well for nostalgic reasons, makes perfect sense. It’ll probably also create a great dynamic with Delirium – say you have an artifact, an instant and a sorcery in your graveyard, and you discard a creature card with Madness. Do you cast it, or do you let it go to the graveyard in order to turn on Delirium? Small things like that.

Also, this dropped today:

Archangel Avacyn

Looking at it from the obvious perspective of an EDH commander, I’d say she’s quite nice. She brings some well-needed protection even if she won’t be surprising anyone. The transformation trigger is pretty easy to satisfy, even in Boros colours, and though the trigger is delayed, she’s pretty tough to deal with, assuming you satisfy the trigger as soon as you cast it. Say you cast it in the middle of your opponent before you’s turn – your stuff is indestructible this turn, so she needs to be exiled or she will live to your upkeep at the very least. If you have an instant-speed sacrifice outlet somewhere in that turn, then you get to transform her immediately, mini-wrathing the board and swinging for 6 in the air!

That said, she doesn’t bring anything that’s really necessary in Boros – card-draw or ramp – and while her day side is vigilant her night side is only flying. She might be worse than other Boros Voltron options, actually.

Also, what really grieves me about the card is the quite blatant sexualization of her character – gone are the reasonable outfits from Khans block, and we’re back to boobage and thighs galore. What’s up with wearing high heels if you’re going to fly?!

What do you think of Avacyn? Leave a comment!

[OGW] Endbringer

oath bannerThe latest spoil that seems confirmed is called Endbringer (funny note: way back when, when I was very into 40k, I had a custom Space Marine chapter called Endbringers), and I expect it to be an EDH staple:

endbringerSo, a very versatile answer that can deal with both small utility creatures and large threats, and also draw cards! The built-in personal Prophet of Krupix also makes him scale well with the format, and I like the political implications of the middle ability a lot.

Overall, I’m very impressed, and I expect to see this in any deck that can produce enough colourless mana to support it.

What do you think of Endbringer? Leave a comment!

[OGW] Goblin Dark-Dwellers

oath bannerGatheringMagic.com has a new spoiler up today, link to the post. It has the somewhat awful name of Goblin Dark-Dwellers, but it has a nice unique effect:

Skärmavbild 2015-12-18 kl. 08.14.21Very neat, if you ask me, a nice evasive 4/4 for 5 is good on its own, and the effect is gravy on top! In Standard, Kolaghan’s Command and Crackling Doom are both popular and potential targets for Goblin Dark-Dwellers effect. Not sure how to properly use it in the constructed format I care about (EDH), but it’s a format full of blink effects if nothing else.

What do you think of Goblin Dark-Dwellers? Leave a comment.

Apologies to everyone for posting the spoiler. But I did link to the source!

 

Re: “Why Leaks Hurt”

oath bannerAs I’ve written about before, Oath of the Gatewatch was subject to perhaps the single biggest leak since the godbook of New Phyrexia was released online. For those who don’t recall, the “godbook” is a full spoiler sent out to those in need of preview info on sets, i.e. magazines etc., and the then-world champion Guillaume Matignon, who wrote for the french Magic magazine “Lotus Noir” shared his godbook with a friend, who shared it with a friend, who leaked it online. An article on this can be found here on the Mothership.

This time around, all of the Mythic Rares from Oath of the Gatewatch were leaked online, in a thread on Reddit, and it has sparked some outcry from the community – some feel robbed of their spoiler season. Others are discussing the mythics, as is.

dewdropspy.fullTrick Jarret wrote a response to the leak, commenting on why it’s bad, in an article on the Mothership entitled “Why Leaks Hurt“. He makes a few points, but overall, I’d call the article quite bad. In fact, I wanted to take a few moments and dissect some of the worst things he states in the article, for the sake of fairness. The article, overall, comes across as quite whiny in my book.

There is a natural struggle between players and Wizards when it comes to knowing the game’s future. Magic‘s entire premise is that of constant change, and this tantalizing premise creates a constant tension between our storytelling and players wanting to know what comes next.

I agree on this point almost entirely, to be honest, and this lets us define the roles for the two players in this opposition: it is the role of Wizards to keep shit under locks until spoiler season officially begins, and it is the role of the community (the parts that wants to know, that is) to find out stuff beforehand. The ball is, as I see it, entirely in Wizards’ court; in the latest leak someone has taken photographs of actual real, physical cards. This means that someone who shouldn’t have gotten their hands on the cards got their hands on the cards, it’s that simple.

Let’s face it – Wizards makes a damn good game, it’s alluring to find stuff out beforehand, and Wizards just can’t blame people for wanting to know stuff about their game. It makes absolutely no sense.

As a person who used to run a fan site that would occasionally leak something, I know the lure for content creators. Leaks draw traffic and they give you something new to talk about. But let’s get one thing straight: leaks aren’t journalism. Publishing leaks is purely self-serving, looking out for the good of yourself and your ego.

Leaks aren’t journalism because there is no cover-up. There’s no secret exposé about the working conditions of goblins on Ravnica, or the water quality on Zendikar, or the climate change on Mirrodin (though that one might have something). Leaks are all things that the public will find out eventually. There’s no conspiracy being unraveled, just something new revealed through the theft of intellectual property. That’s right, theft. If we didn’t give it to you and say “Show this,” then you are stealing something from Wizards of the Coast and the Magic community.

goblinspy.fullLet’s get another thing straight – leaks are definitely journalism. The fact that this journalism presents content in a different context than was intended by the content creator doesn’t take away the fact that this is journalism, at least as far as journalism goes when it comes to Magic. To make an analogy – if president Obama was to hold a speech in the future, about huge changes in, say, the American welfare system, and New York Times got a hold of a first draft of this jaw-dropping speech – if they report on it, is it not journalism because they didn’t wait to hear the speech from the president himself? Of course it is.

Further, the fact that Jarret is trying to call out people reporting on the leaks with a few unsubtle ad homenim-attacks does not make him right in any way. It comes off as petty, honestly.

Would you go on your friend’s Facebook page and announce a pregnancy if you found a positive pregnancy test in their bathroom? No, that would make you a terrible human being! Because it’s not your news to give, and when the world gets to know it is up to that person and their significant other.

Here, Jarret confuses private information (pregnancy) with information regarding a product from a huge company. If I got hold of a picture of an iPhone 7 and posted that on the internet, would that be as bad as revealing an acquaintance’s pregnancy? Of course not, a company is not a personal friend, and the analogy is absurd.

Our policy has and continues to be that we simply don’t discuss leaks. Go read the article from then-Magic Marketing Director Kyle Murray to learn about the problem we were facing even back then, over thirteen years ago. Confirming or disproving a leak may solve the problem in the short term, but it creates a bigger problem in that it can force us to acknowledge each and every rumor. And then when we decide not to comment, it becomes an even bigger deal.

This seems like a fair and stable policy and in my opinion. It makes sense and it’s a clear policy.

Make no mistake, we take leaks very seriously. We always investigate leaks with our internal teams as well as external partners to figure out where and how the leaks happened. We have and will continue to not just ban leakers from the DCI and cancel their Planeswalker Points accounts, but pursue whatever criminal and civil actions necessary to protect our intellectual property and the Magic community.

eyespy.fullRight, it’s one thing to be sour about a leak. I understand that, I really do. By profession, I’m a teacher, and I can get salty if a lesson I’ve been working hard on gets ruined by one or more pupils simply refusing to take part, or even disturb the class. In a worst-case scenario, I might’ve spent four or five hours planning. I can’t imagine if months of work gets ruined by leakers.

That said, outright threats of expulsion from the competitive side of the community is not the proper way to go.

Leaks create an unfair advantage as—because they do not go out over official channels—they are not as widely distributed to less-enfranchised players, thus creating an unfair advantage for some players.

I don’t see how this is relevant in this case – what was spoiled was the expeditions and the mythics, which will have some impact on limited play, but not a whole lot compared to the playable commons. The constructed players will easily have their chance to look at the official spoiler before their first constructed event, leak or no leak.

So if we can’t design a game that is leak-proof, our only other option is to work hard to prevent leaks. Which we do. We follow rigorous security protocols to ensure assets don’t sneak outside the building. So when you see a leak online, what you are seeing is theft, and we have an obligation to pursue and punish those engaged in that activity.

edric,spymasteroftrest.fullThis is a good thing, and it is part of Wizards’ job. Apparently, these security measures failed this time around – and my point is that the blame should probably be placed on Wizards’ security protocol, not on the parts of the community that leaked it, or parts of the community spreading it (like I).

Granted, I don’t know what happened in this case, but I hope we’ll find out eventually. In the case of New Phyrexia, it is a clear breach of trust between the company and a single person – until something like this is clearly proven, I have to assume the breach is internal. There’s no reason to believe outside people should have a hold of physical cards this early, and thus, the blame has to be placed on Wizards.

The community can’t be blamed for liking content from the company, and a spoiler of this magnitude creates not only traffic for a site, but also prestige and attention, two very human desires.

We’re humans, Jarret. Stop being petty about that, and work for a tighter ship instead. It usually works just fine, why didn’t it this time?

[OGW] Gigantic spoiler (Expeditions, Mythics)

oath bannerThe biggest single leak since New Phyrexia’s Godbook leak has been spoiled over on Reddit (link to thread). Someone is getting fired, I’ll tell you that right now. I want to caution anyone who actually looks forward to spoiler season, as I will be spoiling the heck out of the set (rhyme intended, for street cred purposes).

In this post, I will look at the two heavy hitters, the new Chandra and the new Nissa.

The new Chandra looks like this:

chandraflamespeakerChandra, Flamecaller is perhaps the best Chandra we’ve seen in years. Her +1 is effectively a mostly better Ball Lightning every turn, her 0 is crazy in red, and her “ultimate” is flexible enough to net the owner card advantage in many board states. Overall I’m really impressed by her, and I think she’ll see some constructed play. She might even be good enough for EDH thanks to the 0-ability.

Nissa looks even more awesome:

nissazendikarSo the +1 might look underwhelming, but a 3-mana planeswalker that produces chump blockers to protect itself is great, and the other abilities are sweet as well. Again, I’m looking forward to using her in EDH for the -2 ability. There are a lot of cards that synergise well enough with that ability alone. The ultimate, if one gets there, is pretty close to “-7: You win the game”.

What do you think of these spoilers? Leave a comment!

[OGW] Mina and Denn

oath bannerAnother new spoiler has popped up on MythicSpoiler, and it’s a pretty cool new red-green legend, called Mina and Denn, Wildborn:

miradennNote that this above card is a mock-up, since the original scan is in Russian. There are no signs of it being fake as of yet.

And holy moly, a 4/4 for four is on-curve, even if the casting cost is a bit restrictive, and the abilities are insane! Oracle of Mul Daya is a staple for a reason in EDH, and even if this has only half the same effect, it comes with another upside.

I don’t think I would want them commanding their own deck, but they go straight into Omnath!

What do you think of the cool new twins from Oath of the Gatewatch? Leave a comment!

[OGW] The new age of colourless

oath bannerThis little thing popped up on Mythicspoiler today:

mysticgateIt’s the expedition version of Mystic Gate and it notably contains the “Wastes” mana symbol instead of the colourless “1” in the original Shadowmoor printing. This indicates that colourless mana is the same as Wastes mana (assuming the above is not a fake).

This leads me to believe that the new Kozilek, for example, has to be cast with specifically colourless mana. For example, if you tap kozilekthegreatdistortionten Plains, you can not pay for Kozilek, but you can pay for Kozilek by tapping eight Plains and a Sol Ring. It does look a bit strange, though, and the question remains – will all future printings of all cards that produce colourless mana be printed with the “Wastes” symbol instead?

Only time will tell, but I for one hope not. I’m hoping they stick to the regular numbered symbols for clarity, and that the “Wastes” symbol is a thing unique to this block.

What are your theories? Leave a comment!

[OGW] RW land is a fake

oath bannerThe RW folkland I included in my spoilers post yesterday was debunked months ago on Reddit. No idea why it resurfaced now.

It is, as suspected, a fake indeed – which is a shame since I kinda liked it.

My apologies, nonetheless.

[OGW] Ayli and red-white folkland!

oath bannerThe anticipated first of two folklands has been spoiled on the internets, and even though it is certainly classified as “unconfirmed” for now, it is also classified as “sweet”. I’d say it’s quite likely it is a fake indeed, but let’s entertain the thought that it is real. It looks like this:

indignation cliff2The activation is very efficiently costed, and I’m sure it will see plenty of constructed play as soon as some of the more popular 5-toughness creatures (Siege Rhino and Tasigur) rotate out of Standard. I quite like these dual-coloured folklands in EDH – mostly because it’s a threat that’s hard to percieve on a messy board, typical of EDH, and this leads to cituations where they can pick off Planeswalkers out of nowhere.

Overall, a solid card.

The next one is much more exciting, however. Feast your eyes on Ayli, Eternal Pilgrim:

aylieternalpilgrimApologies for the messy photo, but it’s the one available so far. I’d say she’s crazy in any format she’s allowed in, and she will definitely be played in EDH. Karlov has been recieving quite a bit of attention as a potential general of a BW lifegain strategy in EDH, and I’ve seen some very cool brews being posted on Twitter. That said, Ayli is no slouch, and might even be more threatening.

The only part I don’t like about her is the art – did they have to show her midsection for no reason? She’s out climbing mountains, surely wearing clothes that covers the entire body must be preferrable on account of winds, scratching rocks etc.?

Aside the dissapointing art, I’d say the card is a solid A+.


 

What do you think of these new spoilers? Leave a comment!